skip to main |
skip to sidebar
1/16 Picks
NO at IND -2.5, 209.5
|
NO by 0.9
|
|
Winner:
| SPLIT
|
Spread:
| NO +2.5
|
O/U:
| UNDER *****
|
|
|
PHX at CHA -2.5, 207
|
PHX by 2.9
|
|
Winner:
| SPLIT
|
Spread:
| PHX +2.5
|
O/U:
| OVER
|
|
|
SAC -1.5 at WAS, 209
|
SAC by 0.8
|
|
Winner:
| SPLIT
|
Spread:
| WAS +1.5
|
O/U:
| OVER
|
|
|
NYK at DET -1, 194
|
NYK by 4.1
|
|
Winner:
| SPLIT
|
Spread:
| NYK +1
|
O/U:
| OVER
|
|
|
SAS at MEM -1, 199.5
|
SAS by 6.3
|
|
Winner:
| SPLIT
|
Spread:
| SAS +1
|
O/U:
| OVER *****
|
|
|
MIA at OKC -3.5, 194
|
OKC by 2.6
|
|
Winner:
| SPLIT
|
Spread:
| MIA +3.5
|
O/U:
| UNDER
|
|
|
MIL at UTA -9, 193
|
|
UTA by 2.9
|
|
Winner:
| UTA *****
|
Spread:
| MIL +9
|
O/U:
| OVER *****
|
|
|
CLE -8.5 at LAC, 193
|
CLE by 9.3
|
|
Winner:
| CLE *****
|
Spread:
| CLE -8.5
|
O/U:
| UNDER
|
| 16-Jan | Correct | Games | Win% |
| SU - non ***** | 0 | 0 | --- |
| ATS - non ***** | 2 | 8 | 25.0% |
| O/U - non ***** | 2 | 5 | 40.0% |
|
|
| |
| SU ***** | 2 | 2 | 100.0% |
| ATS ***** | 0 | 0 | --- |
| O/U ***** | 2 | 3 | 66.7% |
2 comments:
If you have the straight up winner as a split wouldn't it make sense to pick the underdog?
I'd say not necessarily...
But, I don't have enough information to give a definitive answer.
I don't know, give it a shot.
Post a Comment